study of all of an organism’s low-molecular-weight molecules or metabolites. It is also defined (although sometimes under a slightly different name of metabonomics)as ‘the quantitative measurement of the dynamic multiparametric metabolic response of living systems to pathophysiological stimuli or genetic modification’(Nicholson et al. 1999, 2002).
After more than a decade (Oliver et al., 1998), metabolomics has begun to acquire some credence in the scientific community and is finally coming of age, although its acceptance cannot be compared with that of its forerunners,
Image via Wikipedia
genomics and proteomics.
The legitimization of metabolomics as a valid scientific entity depends on the size of the research community it influences (Arita, 2009). By far the most effective medium for inoculation is the web infrastructure: public servers that accommodate experimental data, simple formats and guidelines for their interpretation, and connectivity between data and tools for analysis. When these elements satisfy the condition to initiate a social epidemic, metabolomics will be accepted as a fundamental data-driven science that can unite hitherto independently conducted research disciplines.
At present, both technologies are applied not only to traditional biology but also to metagenomics and environmental sciences, such as the monitoring of microbial dynamics in different environments [Fan at el., 2009; Wikoff et al. 2009].
Still, enthusiasm for metabolomics continues to be lukewarm. Although the name ‘metabolomics’ suggests comprehensive detection, the number of identifiable metabolites is currently limited even if multiple measurement technologies are combined [Fernie, 2007]
The trade-off between coverage(physicochemical variations of metabolites that can be detected by the same method) and/or sensitivity (the lowest detectable metabolite concentration), and precision (accuracy of detected masses or signals) is a severe hurdle this emerging technology has yet to overcome, and the identifiable number of metabolites has not increased
In their seminal paper, Fiehn et al. used gas chromatography/ mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and reported the peak assignment of 164 metabolites (101 polar and 63 lipophilic)
in Arabidopsis thaliana [Fiehn et al, 2007]. After nearly a decade, using the same analytical platform, the number of metabolites identifiable at top research institutes was even
lower; this may be attributable to higher measurement accuracy [14,15]. In 2003, Soga et al. reported the detection of 1692 ionic metabolite peaks from Bacillus subtilis by capillary electrophoresis/mass spectrometry (CE/MS) .
Another important factor is the intelligibility of data. In biology, the readability of raw data affects popularity. In fact, metabolism, the primary research topic in metabolomics, is notorious for its incomprehensibility and many researchers stayed away from metabolic networks containing lengthy structural and stoichiometric information. The KEGG database gained popularity for its oversimplified representation of metabolic networks: each metabolite is represented as a node without structure, and each reaction as a binary relationship without stoichiometry .
In metabolomics we confront many ambiguous data such as metabolite IDs and mass spectral tags (MSTs), that is, repeatedly detected but unidentified mass signals that account for more than half of the detected spectral peaks .
Metabolon has recently got 6 millions in serises C financing
Metabolon offers global biochemical profiling (metabolomic) services to researchers working in drug safety and toxicology, bioprocess optimization, consumer products and other areas which benefit from insight into complex biochemical processes and how they change in response to experimental variables.
The company’s technology has been used to identify biochemical biomarkers useful for the development of a wide range of diagnostics. These markers are being applied to the development of its own proprietary diagnostic tools for prostate cancer and insulin resistance.
METABOLON CLOSES ADDITIONAL FINANCING
Series C Round Now Closed with a Total of $12.3 Million in Additional Capital
Ellis DI, Dunn WB, Griffin JL, Allwood JW, Goodacre R: Metabolic
fingerprinting as a diagnostic tool. Pharmacogenomics 2007,
Walsh MC, Nugent A, Brennan L, Gibney MJ: Understanding the
metabolome — challenges for metabolomics. Nutr Bull 2009,
Scalbert A, Brennan L, Fiehn O, Hankemeier T, Kristal BS, van
Ommen B, Pujos-Guillot E, Verheij E, Wishart D, Wopereis S:
Mass-spectrometry-based metabolomics: limitations and
recommendations for future progress with particular focus on
nutrition research. Metabolomics 2009. (Epub ahead of print).
Presented by eminent scientists in metabolomics research, this review
spans topics from the technological foundation of metabolomics to its
future challenges. It is highly recommended as an overview of the
14. Kusano M, Fukushima A, Arita M, Jonsson P, Moritz T,
Kobayashi M, Hayashi N, Tohge T, Saito K: Unbiased
characterization of genotype-dependent metabolic
regulations by metabolomic approach in Arabidopsis thaliana.
BMC Syst Biol 2007, 1:53.
15. Lytovchenko A, Beleggia R, Schauer N, Isaacson T, Leuendorf JE,
Hellmann H, Rose JK, Fernie AR: Application of GC–MS for the
detection of lipophilic compounds in diverse plant tissues.
Plant Methods 2009, 5:4
16. Soga T, Ohashi Y, Ueno Y, Naraoka H, Tomita M, Nishioka T:
Quantitative metabolome analysis using capillary
electrophoresis mass spectrometry. J Proteome Res 2003,
17. van der Werf MJ, Overkamp KM, Muilwijk B, Coulier L,
Hankemeier T: Microbial metabolomics: toward a platform
with full metabolome coverage. Anal Biochem 2007,
TNO Quality of Life, 3700 AJ Zeist, The Netherlands. email@example.com
18. Gladwell M: The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big
DifferenceLittle, Brown and Company; 2000.
19. Liolios K, Mavromatis K, Tavernarakis N, Kyrpides NC: The
Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2007: status of genomic
and metagenomic projects and their asso
34. Okuda S, Yamada T, Hamajima M, Itoh M, Katayama T, Bork P,
Goto S, Kanehisa M: KEGG Atlas mapping for global
analysis of metabolic pathways. Nucleic Acids Res 2008,
35. Arita M: The metabolic world of Escherichia coli is not small.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004, 101:1543-1547.
50. Kopka J, Schauer N, Krueger S, Birkemeyer C, Usadel B,
Bergmu¨ ller E, Do¨ rmann P, Weckwerth W, Gibon Y, Stitt M et al.:
GMD@CSB.DB: the Golm Metabolome Database.
Bioinformatics 2005, 21:1635-1638.
51. Horai H, Arita M, Nishioka T: Comparison of ESI-MS Spectra in
MassBank Database. In Proceedings of the First International
Conference on BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (BMEI), vol
2; Sanya, China: 2008:853-857.
52. Wishart DS, Knox C, Guo AC, Eisner R, Young N, Gautam B,
Hau DD, Psychogios N, Dong E, Bouatra S et al.: HMDB: a
knowledgebase for the human metabolome. Nucleic Acids Res
53. Kind T, Scholz M, Fiehn O: How large is the metabolome? A
critical analysis of data exchange practices in chemistry. PLoS
One 2009, 4:e5440.
Arita M. What can metabolomics learn from genomics and proteomics? Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2009 Dec;20(6):610-5. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
Metabolomics review (see pubmed abstract and the full article in pdf format)
Fan WMT, Bird JA, Brodie EL, Lane AN: 13C-isotopomer-based
metabolomics of microbial groups isolated from two forest
soils. Metabolomics 2009, 5:108-122.
Fernie AR: The future of metabolic phytochemistry: larger
numbers of metabolites, higher resolution, greater
understanding. Phytochemistry 2007, 68:2861-2880.
Fiehn O, Kopka J, Do¨ rmann P, Altmann T, Trethewey RN,
Willmitzer L: Metabolite profiling for plant functional genomics.
Nat Biotechnol 2000, 18:1157-1161.
Nicholson JK, Lindon JC, Holmes E (1999) ‘Metabonomics’:
understanding the metabolic responses of living systems to
pathophysiological stimuli via multivariate statistical
analysis of biological NMR spectroscopic data. Xenobiotica 29: 1181–1189
Nicholson JK, Connelly J, Lindon JC, Holmes E (2002) Metabonomics: a platform for studying drug toxicity and gene function. Nat Rev Drug Discov 1: 153–161
Oliver SG, Winson MK, Kell DB, Baganz F. 1998. Systematic functional analysis of the yeast genome. Trends in Biotechnology 16: 373-378.
Tweeddale H, Notley-McRobb L, Ferenci T (1998) Effect of slow growth on metabolism of Escherichia coli, as revealed by global metabolite pool (‘‘metabolome’’) analysis.
J Bacteriol 180: 5109–5116
Wikoff WR, Anfora AT, Liu J, Schultz PG, Lesley SA, Peters EC,
Siuzdak G: Metabolomics analysis reveals large effects of gut
microflora on mammalian blood metabolites. Proc Natl Acad
Sci U S A 2009, 106:3698-3703.