Showing posts with label SARS-CoV-2. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SARS-CoV-2. Show all posts

Monday, May 16, 2022

Resolving the subtypes of COVID-19 in the elderly

SARS-Cov-2 is one of the most complex viruses known to medical science. Patients with COVID-19 present a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations, ranging from asymptomatic infection to lethal outcome. Both the young and the old may have very different clusters of symptoms and responses to medications, including the COVID-19 vaccines.  Each type is associated with how severe of an illness a patient might experience, ranging from asymptomatic to lethal. 


Precision medicine approaches such as whole-exome sequencing can provide insight into the phenotypes, endotypes and underlying mechanisms of the disease. The high cost of cutting-edge approaches, however, keeps these tools out of reach for many research teams. 

In this age of big data and large clinical studies, we should not forget about the value of individual cases. A good case report tells a detailed story. It describes a unique phenotype and offers unique clues to its resolution into an endotype. 

A new systematic review of case reports aims to answer questions about COVID-19 subtypes in octogenarians, nonagenarians, and centenarians and offer possible solutions to organize the knowledge and identify the gaps. 


REFERENCE

Irene S. Gabashvili. The outcomes of COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection in octogenarians, nonagenarians, and centenarians. PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022332621 Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022332621

Irene S. Gabashvili (2022), “COVID-19 vaccine and SARS-CoV-2 in the oldest old: rapid literature review”, Mendeley Data, v1 http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/6sk33d9z7s.1 https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/6sk33d9z7s/1

Irene S. Gabashvili (2022), “The Outcomes of COVID-19 and Vaccination in the Oldest Old: a Longitudinal Observational Study and Literature Review”, April 2022, DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15625.93285

Thursday, December 16, 2021

Cutaneous manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 vaccines

 COVID-19 is associated with a wide range of skin signs. 


The following six main clinical patterns have been proposed for such manifestations most recently: (i) urticarial rash, (ii) confluent erythematous/maculopapular/morbilliform rash, (iii) papulovesicular exanthem, (iv) chilblain-like acral pattern, (v) livedo reticularis/racemosa-like pattern, and (vi) purpuric "vasculitic" pattern. Livedo or necrosis - blotchy red or blue appearance with a net-like pattern - was associated with increased disease severity while measles-like (morbilliform) rash was generally seen in patients with moderate to severe infection (like in the patient shown on the left who died) and pseudo-chilblains, a late sign of COVID-19, was associated with decreased severity and more likely to happen for younger patients. The median duration of chiblain-like acral pattern, however, was significantly longer that all other patterns. One study of 200 patients found the following frequencies of these signs: 10.2% for Urticarial rash; 25.7% for confluent erythematous/maculo-papular/morbilliform rash; 15.5% for papulovesicular exanthem, 24.6% for a chilblain-like acral pattern; 2.1% for a livedo reticularis/racemosa-like pattern; and 6.9% for a purpuric vasculitic pattern. 15% of skin patterns were not clearly classified while 6.5% had more than one pattern present.

The prevalence of cutaneous involvement was 7.8% in a binational Chinese-Italian cohort of 678 hospitalized adults with laboratory-confirmed disease. Dermatologic reactions after COVID-19 vaccines have been also reported and can mimic SARS-CoV-2 infection itself (eg, pernio/chilblains). The prevalence was the highest after the 2nd dose of mRNA-1273 (over 12% in Moderna), although only 1-2% experienced it with ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine (AstraZeneca).

Delayed large local reactions were most common among vaccinees, followed by local injection site reactions, urticarial eruptions, and morbilliform eruptions. In a study of 414 people, forty-three percent of patients with first-dose reactions experienced second-dose recurrence. Additional less-common reactions included pernio/chilblains, dyshidrotic eczema, psoriasiform dermatitis, cosmetic filler reactions, zoster, herpes simplex flares, and pityriasis rosea-like reactions. 

Some of more serious reactions could be exacerbation of Erythema multiforme. It mostly happens in mild form of a sudden rash that goes away in a few weeks but could progress to larger raised patches that look like a target or "bulls-eye" and may have a blister or crust. Relapses of autoimmune bullous disease have been also reported as well as new onset Lichen planus, immune complex vasculitis or flares of subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus, psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. 

Morphologic misclassification is, however, possible. 


REFERENCES

Tan SW, Tam YC, Oh CC. Skin manifestations of COVID-19: A worldwide review. JAAD international. 2021 Mar 1;2:119-33.

Slimani Y, Abbassi R, El Fatoiki FZ, Barrou L, Chiheb S. Systemic lupus erythematosus and varicella‐like rash following COVID‐19 in a previously healthy patient. Journal of Medical Virology. 2021 Feb;93(2):1184-7.

Genovese G, Moltrasio C, Berti E, Marzano AV. Skin manifestations associated with COVID-19: current knowledge and future perspectives. Dermatology. 2021 Jan 1:1-2. 

Marzano AV, Genovese G, Moltrasio C, Gaspari V, Vezzoli P, Maione V, Misciali C, Sena P, Patrizi A, Offidani A, Quaglino P. The clinical spectrum of COVID-19–associated cutaneous manifestations: An Italian multicenter study of 200 adult patients. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2021 May 1;84(5):1356-63. 

Bogdanov G, Bogdanov I, Kazandjieva J, Tsankov N. Cutaneous adverse effects of the available COVID-19 vaccines. Clinics in Dermatology. 2021 Apr 27.

Rice SM, Ferree SD, Mesinkovska NA, Kourosh AS. The art of prevention: COVID-19 vaccine preparedness for the dermatologist. International journal of women's dermatology. 2021 Jan 12.



Thursday, August 12, 2021

August 12

When we thought COVID-19 was over, as more individuals were vaccinated against the deadly virus, the fourth wave of the pandemic struck, fueling a rise in breakthrough infections. 

We have documented several cases of fatal breakthrough infections. Publishing it is not easy because of many biases. 

Science has been always linked to the politics of society. Current political polarization hinders not only effective COVID-19 pandemic mitigation measures but also impedes research on side effects of vaccines and fatal breakthrough infections in healthy individuals. Social media fuels the divide encouraging toxic discussion, favoring rude and disrespectful comments. 

Publishing bias is another issue since scientific journals prefer to publish positive results discriminating against negative or null results. 

But we have many documented cases from the COVID-back-to-normal study and information about other COVID victims from genealogy and other sources. Let the truth be told. 


REFERENCES

Berkessel J, Ebert T, Gebauer J, Jonsson T, Oishi S. Pandemics Initially Spread Among People of High (not Low) Social Status: Evidence from COVID-19 and the Spanish Flu. PsyArXiv, 12 Jan. 2021. [example of using genealogy sites for medical research]

Gabashvili IS. Community-Based Phenotypic Study of Safety, Tolerability, Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity of Emergency-Use-Authorized Vaccines Against COVID-19 and Viral Shedding Potential of Post-Vaccination Infections: Protocol for an Ambispective study. medRxiv. 2021 Jun 1. medRxiv 2021.06.28.21256779; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.28.21256779

blockquote { margin:1em 20px; background: #dfdfdf; padding: 8px 8px 8px 8px; font-style: italic; }